Jack The Ripper Essay -- Papers

Jack The Ripper In August 1888, the first of a series of murders was committed by a killer who became known as Jack the Ripper. To this day the identity of the killer remains a mystery. Five women were brutally killed in the East End of London, by a maniac who appeared to kill without warning and with no remorse. 1)What can you learn from Source A? Source A tells us that the two murders were aimed directly at the poorest people in East End at the time, and usually because of the poverty at that time, the women had to revert to prostitution so this tells us that the murderer had a great dislike for poor people or mainly prostitutes, but there was no clear motive for him to do it. It also tells us that these two murders had been done with an extra amount of effort, which later becomes his signature way of murdering, so that this informs us that the killer may not have had a motive, but he knew what he was doing, so he wasn't totally insane. 2)Does Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B? Sources B and C strongly support each other, while source A differs a little. Source B is the Coroner's report on the death of Polly Nicholls. In this, it says "No unskilled person could have known where to find the organs, or to have recognized them when they were found. No mere slaughterer of animals could have carried out these operations" and in Source C the report describes how Elizabeth Stride was killed and it shows that is was done in a professional way, taking care in all the way s that she was laid out to be found and the slice across the throat "cutting the windpipe completely in two" They agree with each other becau... ...them on wild goose chase. The detective methods were also slowly evolving, so no fingerprints, DNA tests or anything could be used as they were all in the early stages of their development. There were also differences in opinion. For example Mary Kelly- Dr. Bond though her time of death was between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM, and Dr. Phillips thought that is was between 5:00 AM and 6:00AM. This didn't help the police with the evidence of the witnesses either. The primitive ways of the police and the fact that the Metropolitan Police didn't get along with the City of London police, they were un-cooperative so this slowed down things even further. When the first victim was killed, the commissioner of the Metropolitan police was out of the country, so the officers were left to figure things out for themselves whit no guidance.

Malcolm X Essay -- essays research papers

Throughout history there have been many people who have stood out and made an impact in the way we think and comprehend things. During the late 1950's and early 1960's, Malcolm X was no exception. His militant views that Western nations were inherently racist and that black people must join together to build their own society and value system had an important influence on black nationalist and black separatist movements of the 1950s and 1960s. At the beginning of the movie, Malcolm X was born Malcolm Little. He was a young child trying to adapt to society's changes. He was looking so hard that he fell into the wrong crowd. Malcolm bumped into a man named Archie who was a big time thief. Archie ran a numbers system in the streets and he convinced Malcolm to join him. Malcolm became a scoundrel with an evil demeanor. Malcolm's business partner, was a white woman by the name of Sophia. They were on drugs and even robbed a house. Because of their antics, the law was on their trail. They eventually caught and sent to prison. Malcolm was sentenced to 8 years in prison while Sophia was only sentenced to 2 years because she was white. This relates to the social organization of arrest, which suggest that police arrest blacks at a higher rate than whites. While Malcolm was in jail, he was well known to the guards. One time he was asked to state his number, but instead he said he forgot his number. The guards beat the hell out of him and sent him to the darkroom. In the darkroom ...

Dissertation on Retention

Management Decision Emerald Article: A reconceptualization of mentoring and sponsoring Earnest Friday, Shawnta S. Friday, Anna L. Green Article information: To cite this document: Earnest Friday, Shawnta S. Friday, Anna L. Green, (2004),†A reconceptualization of mentoring and sponsoring†, Management Decision, Vol. 42 Iss: 5 pp. 628 – 644 Permanent link to this document: http://dx. doi. org/10. 1108/00251740410538488 Downloaded on: 26-10-2012 References: This document contains references to 54 other documents Citations: This document has been cited by 7 other documents To copy this document: [email  protected] om This document has been downloaded 1621 times since 2005. * Users who downloaded this Article also downloaded: * David Clutterbuck, (2004),†Making the most of informal mentoring: A positive climate is key†, Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 18 Iss: 4 pp. 16 – 17 http://dx. doi. org/10. 1108/14777280410544574 (2004),†R eview articles Getting the best out of workplace mentoring: More help for the helper†, Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 18 Iss: 5 pp. 20 – 22 http://dx. doi. org/10. 108/14777280410554979 Sandy Bond, (2011),†Barriers and drivers to green buildings in Australia and New Zealand†, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 29 Iss: 4 pp. 494 – 509 http://dx. doi. org/10. 1108/14635781111150367 Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY For Authors: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service. Information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www. emeraldinsight. om/authors for more information. About Emerald www. emeraldinsight. com With over forty years' experience, Emerald Group Publishing is a leading independent publisher of global research with impact in business, society, public policy and education. In total, Emerald publishes over 275 journals and more than 130 book series, as well as an extensive range of online products and services. Emerald is both COUNTER 3 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. Related content and download information correct at time of download. The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at www. emeraldinsight. com/researchregister The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www. emeraldinsight. com/0025-1747. htm MD 42,5 A reconceptualization of mentoring and sponsoring Earnest Friday Department of Management and International Business, College of Business Administration, Miami, Florida, USA 628 Shawnta S. Friday and Anna L. GreenSchool of Business and Industry, Florida A University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA Keywords Mentoring, Career development Abstract Mentoring is highly regarded as a career-enhancing phenomenon necessary for any aspiring executive. Several debates within the literature have led to a lack of consistency regarding the de? nition of mentoring and a mentor, the functions of a mentor, and the various types of mentoring. It appears that much of the confusion stems from the relationship and association of mentoring with the concept of sponsoring.Within the majority of the literature regarding developmental relationships, sponsoring has been posited to be a sub-function of mentoring. This paper presents two arguments for viewing and examining mentoring and sponsoring as distinctly different, non-mutually exclusive, and possibly concurrent phenomena, as well as offers universal de? nitions for both terms. This delineation is offered to aid aspiring executives in their decision making process as to whether to select a mentor, a sponsor, or both. Man agement Decision Vol. 42 No. 5, 2004 pp. 628-644 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 0025-1747 DOI 10. 108/00251740410538488 Introduction Mentoring is an enduring and dynamic phenomenon, which dates back to ancient Greece when Odysseus entrusted the eponymous character, Mentor, with his son, Telemachus thousands of years ago in Homer’s Odyssey (Friday and Friday, 2002). The term â€Å"mentoring† has surged into the literature in many disciplines (e. g. , sociology, social psychology, education, management, social work, healthcare management, etc. ) over the last several decades. Mentoring emerged in the organizational literature in the late 1970s (e. g. Clawson, 1979; Collins and Scott, 1978; Kanter, 1977; Phillips, 1977; Roche, 1979; Shapiro et al. , 1978). Since that time, hundreds of books and articles (popular press, practitioner-oriented, and academic) have been published on mentoring in various organizational settings alone, not to mention other settings in which mentoring has been examined (e. g. , teaching, nursing, social work, etc. ) (Kelly, 2001). Published works in the organizational literature on mentoring have been anecdotal, conceptual, and empirical; and several journals have dedicated special editions to mentoring.By and large, these published works have highlighted the overwhelming perceived bene? ts (e. g. , increased mobility, promotion opportunity, and total compensation), and minimal perceived drawbacks of mentoring (Campion and Gold? nch, 1983; Kelly, 2001; Scandura, 1992, 1998; Whitely et al. , 1991, 1992). Hence, mentoring has been proclaimed as one of the key career development and advancement tools in the organizational milieu over the last decade (Simonetti et al. , 1999). In the organizational literature, Kram’s (1980) work has been viewed as one of the most comprehensive treatments of the mentoring concept (Scandura, 1998).It is implicit in Kram’s (1980, 1983, 1985) works that she explored naturally occu rring, informal mentoring relationships. Consequently, the functions and phases of mentoring that she inducted pertain primarily to informal mentoring. Based on her ? ndings, Kram (1980) suggested that mentors provide career support (sponsorship, exposure-and-visibility, coaching, protection, and challenging assignments) and psychosocial support (role modeling, acceptance-and-con? rmation, counseling, and ? ? friendship) to their proteges. She also suggested that mentorships (mentoring relationships) move through four phases: ? (1) initiation (the mentor and protege admire, respect, and trust one another); ? ? (2) cultivation (the protege develops competence and con? dence from the career and psychosocial support provided by the mentor); ? ? (3) separation (the paternalistic relationship between the mentor and protege changes, which may lead to non-positive affective experiences for both, because ? ? the protege has become more independent and empowered); and ? ? (4) rede? nition (t he mentor and protege’s relationship is reshaped to meet more collegial needs) (Kram, 1983).A canvassing of published works examining organizational mentoring suggests that as far back as the early 1980s (e. g. , Campion and Gold? nch, 1983; Hunt and Michael, 1983) and as recent as the early 2000s (e. g. , Higgins and Kram, 2001; Kelly, 2001) a lack of consensus on the de? nitions of mentoring and mentor has been articulated in the literature (Chao, 1998; Kelly, 2001; Lawson, 1996; Minter and Thomas, 2000; Noe, 1988a, 1988b). Hence, research on organizational mentoring has been criticized for not being conceptually well grounded (Gibb, 1994). An examination of over 200 practitioner and academic journal articles in the ? ld of management alone revealed that most de? nitions in the literature of mentoring, stated or implied, include sponsor or sponsoring as inherent in mentoring (e. g. , Campion and Gold? nch, 1983; Kram, 1983; Noe, 1988a, 1988b; Turban and Dougherty, 1994; Whi tely et al. , 1991), while some do not (e. g. , Covaleski et al. , 1998; Hunt and Michael, 1983). Similarly, most de? nitions of mentor (stated or implied) within the literature include sponsor or sponsoring in the de? nition (e. g. , Higgins and Kram, 2001; Scandura, 1998; Whitely et al. , 1991), while some do not (e. g. Hunt and Michael, 1983; Scandura and Schriesheim, 1994). Interestingly, some researchers did not directly state a de? nition of mentoring or mentor in either their survey or interviewing of participants (Phillips-Jones, 1982; Whitely et al. , 1992), thus allowing participants to draw on their own intuitive understanding of the mentor and mentoring concepts (Ragins and Cotton, 1993). However, other researchers did provide a de? nition of one of the concepts (mentor or mentoring) even though they recognized that the participants are still likely to draw on their own intuitive understanding of the terms (Chao et al. 1992; Ragins and Cotton, 1993). Still, given this la ck of consensus on de? nitions for mentoring and mentor, researchers and practitioners alike have continued to examine and explore various facets of mentoring. Those various facets include mentoring functions (e. g. , Kram, 1980, 1983), mentoring phases (e. g. , Kram, 1980, 1983), types of mentoring (e. g. , Burke and McKeen, 1989; Chao et al. , 1992), potential bene? ts of mentoring (e. g. , Fagenson, 1989; Scandura, 1992; Whitely et al. , 1992), potential drawbacks of mentoring (e. g. , Ragins et al. 2000; Scandura, 1998), diversity in mentoring (e. g. , Ragins, 1997; Ragins and Scandura, 1994; Thomas, 1993), and mentoring alternatives (e. g. , Higgins and Kram; Kram and Isabella, 1985). While many researchers have articulated the idea that the operational de? nitions of mentoring and mentor have varied considerably within Mentoring and sponsoring 629 MD 42,5 630 the last several decades, with some encompassing sponsorship or sponsor (Chao, 1998; Higgins and Kram, 2001; Mullen, 19 98), two of those major researchers have argued that mentoring needs to be reconceptualized (Higgins and Kram, 2001).Hence, two arguments for reconceptualizing mentoring are offered: (1) the lack of clarity and consensus on the de? nitions of a mentor, the process of mentoring, and the role of sponsoring; and ? ? (2) informal and formal proteges tend not to always receive career support, speci? cally sponsoring from their mentors (Bahniuk and Kogler Hill, 1998; Chao et al. , 1992; Noe, 1988b). Thus, the aim of this paper is to reconceptualize mentoring and sponsoring, and to offer them as distinctly different concepts, rather than viewing sponsoring as an inherent sub-function of mentoring.Therefore, it is posited that the reconceptualization of these two terms (mentoring and sponsoring) may bring much needed clarity and consensus to the organizational mentoring literature. It is also posited that this reconceptualization will provide aspiring executives with new knowledge to use in their decision making process as they select individuals to help them advance their careers. Mentoring and sponsoring – argument one Dalton et al. ’s (1977) theory of professional career development distinguished between mentor and sponsor, suggesting that an individual becomes a sponsor after being a mentor. On the other hand, Levinson et al. 1978, p. 97) viewed â€Å"a mentor as. . . a teacher, advisor, or sponsor†. These assertions would lead some to believe that the terms mentor and sponsor are confusing and overlapping (Campion and Gold? nch, 1983). As a result, the following question arises: has mentoring been used as a â€Å"catch-all† term? The answer would appear to be yes, given that the following terms have been used to describe a mentor in the organizational literature: guide, host advisor, sponsor, role model, teacher, protector, invisible godparent, friend, coach, counselor, patron, exemplar, benefactor, and advocate (Kelly, 2001; Pittenger and Heimann, 2000).Yet, Chao (1998) asserted that distinctions have been made between the terms mentor and sponsor. More recently, Higgins and Kram (2001, p. 269) echoed Chao’s (1998) sentiments, and distinguished between a mentor and sponsor by stating that â€Å"true mentors. . . provide high amounts of both career and psychosocial support, and sponsors. . . provide high amounts of career support but low amounts of psychosocial support†. Whether it is the interchangeable use of these two terms or the current de? itions of each that are posited to represent their distinction, it is feasible that both, to some degree, have contributed to much of the confusion in the organizational mentoring literature, thus leading to the mixed results on mentoring (Jacobi, 1991). In spite of the confusion and mixed results, mentoring relationships have been viewed as â€Å"one of the most complex and developmentally important relationships† in organizational settings (Levinson et al. , 1978, p. 97). Thus, mentorships and sponsorships have been pronounced to be critically important to the upward mobility of individuals in organizations (Kanter, 1977).The work of Levinson et al. (1978) served as the theoretical foundation for much of Kram’s (1980, 1983) work on mentoring, which appears to be the most comprehensive treatment in the organizational literature (Scandura, 1998). They suggested that a mentor is an individual who is usually older and â€Å"of greater experience and seniority. . . a teacher, adviser or sponsor† (Levinson et al. , 1978, p. 97). Building on the work of Levinson et al. (1978), Kram (1980) suggested that a mentor is a more senior ? ? individual who provides career and psychosocial support for the protege.Kram (1980, 1983) postulated career functions to include sponsorship, exposure and visibility, coaching, protection, and challenging assignments. The psychosocial functions were postulated to included role modeling, acce ptance-and-con? rmation, counseling, and friendship (Kram, 1980, 1983). Many of the de? nitions of a mentor used throughout the literature referenced Kram’s (1980, 1983, 1985) de? nition of mentor. Table I delineates how the terms â€Å"sponsor† or â€Å"sponsorship† are explicit in the de? nitions of mentor or mentoring that stem from Levinson et al. ’ (1978) and Kram’s (1980) de? nitions.Table I also depicts the de? nitions or lack of de? nitions of mentoring, mentor, and sponsor used in some published works that are generally considered premier management journals (Cabell, 2001). Due to the myriad management-related articles on mentoring, this method was chosen to determine which sampling of articles would be included in the table. As outlined in Table I, not all articles on mentoring explicitly de? ned mentoring, mentor, and/or sponsor, while a few did. As previously stated, in most cases, sponsoring is considered as sub-function of mentoring. Although there are various de? itions of mentor used throughout the literature, there appears to be more consistency in the de? nitions of sponsor used within the literature (see Table I). Sponsoring has been viewed in the literature as a developmental relationship in ? ? which the sponsor provides instrumental career support by nominating the protege for promotion and other types of organizational activities that may be supportive of promotion (Campion and Gold? nch, 1983; Thomas, 1993). This is relatively consistent ? ? with Kanter’s (1977) work, which posits that sponsors facilitate proteges in obtaining ? inside information and bypassing the hierarchy, as well as ? ght for their proteges’ promotions. While Shapiro et al. ’s (1978) continuum of advisory/support relationships acknowledges a difference between the organizational power that mentors and sponsors ? ? have in promoting the upward mobility of their proteges, they consider sponsors to have less organ izational power than mentors thereby causing mentors to be seen as more prominent than sponsors. It is highly probable that as a result of the works of Shapiro et al. 1978) and Kram (1980; 1983), which considers sponsoring a sub-function provided by mentors, that sponsoring has been viewed as a less powerful organizational developmental relationship than mentoring (Chao, 1998). This subjugation, thus causes sponsoring to remain in the shadows of organizational mentoring research. It is worthy to note that Kram’s (1980, 1983) early works were based on ? ndings from a sample in which a majority (11) of the 18 developmental relationships were direct or indirect reporting relationships in some phase of the developmental relationship.Consequently, the mentors had direct or indirect responsibility for promoting their ? ? protege. In which case, sponsoring (the nominating for promotion) was inherent in the developmental relationships Kram (1980, 1983) observed. Thus, Kram (1980, 198 3) was actually observing concurrent phenomena within her sample. Therefore, much of the organizational mentoring theory developed by Kram (1980, 1983) is based on what in recent research has been termed â€Å"supervisory mentoring†. Following suit, the supervisor-subordinate relationship has been the focus of much of the mentoring research (Gibb and Megginson, 1993).In this type of relationship, there is a high Mentoring and sponsoring 631 MD 42,5 632 Author (year) Campion and Gold? nch A relationship in which an individual takes a 1) Any individual who has a signi? cant positive 1) A sponsor discovers and fosters (1983) personal interest in another’s career and guides in? uence on another’s career, whether the role be individuals for higher placement in or sponsors that person one of sponsor, coach, or counselor other parts of the organization 2) A sponsor functions to generate ? power in proteges by ? ghting for and promoting them, by allowing them to bypass the hierarchy and obtain inside information, and by re? ected power or power by association Hunt and Michael (1983) Involves a unique, often emotionally 1) A person who suggests and advises new â€Å"fast interpersonal type of support and advising role track† recruits on career success matters that can be used to train and develop talented 2) A trusted counselor or guide ? ? ? proteges in many careers and organizations 3) A guide supporting a protege’s young adult dreams and helping in the attainment of them ? ? 4) A nonparental career role model for a protege Kram and Isabella Has a great potential to enhance the (1985) development of individuals in both early and middle career stages Noe (1988a) 1) An experienced, productive manager who relates well to a less-experienced employee and facilitates his/her personal development for the bene? t of the individual as well as that of the organization 2) Usually eight to 15 years older than the ? protege who frequently is a y oung professional with high career aspirations Noe (1988b) 1) A senior, experienced employee who serves as a role model, provides support, direction, and feedback to the younger employee regarding career plans and interpersonal development, and ? ? increases the visibility of the protege to decision makers in the organization who may in? uence career opportunities (continued) Table I. De? nitions of mentoring, mentor, and sponsor given in articles in premier journals Mentor de? nition(s) given in article Sponsor de? nition Mentoring/mentorship de? ition(s) given in article Author (year) Mentors actively intervene, contriving ? ? to get their proteges exposure and visibility through assignments that involve working with other managers ? ? and endorsing their proteges for promotions and special projects Mentoring/mentorship de? nition(s) given in article Mentor de? nition(s) given in article Sponsor de? nition Whitely et al. (1991) Whitely et al. (1992) 1) A particular interpersonal r elationship that can in? uence career progress 2) Classical, or primary, mentoring is an intense developmental relationship of relatively long ? duration in which proteges receive a range of career and psychosocial help exclusively from one senior manager 3) Secondary mentoring is a shorter, less intense, less inclusive developmental process involving multiple relationships, each offering specialized developmental functions, which tends to focus on external, career progress-oriented functions, such as sponsorship and visibility and exposure, rather than on inner-oriented psychosocial development functions 4) A set of roles and role activities including coaching, support, and sponsorship 5) Psychosocial mentoring referring to activities like providing counselling and friendship 6) Career mentoring referring to providing sponsorship, exposure, and the like 1) â€Å"Classical† mentoring is where the developmental relationship is of relatively long duration, is intense, mostly ex clusive, and in ? which a protege receives a range of career-oriented and psychosocial help from one senior manager 2) Career mentoring includes short duration, less intense, multiple, and less exclusive relationships that are more specialized in the kind of progress-oriented functions provided to ? ? proteges, they are more likely to focus on external, career-oriented mentoring functions, such as sponsorship or visibility/exposure, than on â€Å"inner-oriented† psychosocial developmental functions (continued) Mentoring and sponsoring 633 Table I. MD 42,5 634 Author (year) 1) Someone who provides high amounts of both career and psychosocial support 2) â€Å"The mentor is ordinarily several years older, a person of greater experience and seniority. . . a teacher, adviser or sponsor† (Levinson et al. , 1978) Higgins and Kram (2001) Chao et al. (1992)Ragins and Scandura (1994) Scandura and Schriesheim (1994) Turban and Dougherty 1) A set of role activities, including coac hing, (1994) support, and sponsorship, that upper-level ? ? managers provide to proteges Tepper (1995) Table I. Mentor de? nition(s) given in article Sponsor de? nition 1) A sponsor is included in one of the de? nitions of a mentor 2) Someone who provides high amounts of career support but low amounts of psychosocial support 1) Individuals with advanced experience and knowledge who are committed to providing support to and increasing the upward mobility ? ? of junior organization members, their proteges 2) An individual in? ential in the work environment who has advanced experience and knowledge and who is committed to providing upward mobility and support to careers 1) A trusted counsellor who accepts a guiding role in the development of a younger or less-experienced member of the organization 1) An in? uential individual at work who has advanced knowledge and who is committed to providing upward mobility and support to a person’s career (continued) Mentoring/mentorship de? nition(s) given in article 1) The developmental assistance provided by a ? ? more senior individual within a protege’s organization 2) A relationship in which a senior person ? ? working in the protege’s organization assists ? with the protege’s personal and professional development Mentorship is de? ned as an intense work relationship between senior (mentor) and junior ? ? (protege) organizational members. The mentor has experience and power in the organization and personally advises, counsels, coaches, and ? ? promotes the career development of the protege. ? ? Promotion of the protege’s career may occur directly through actual promotions or indirectly through the mentor’s in? uence and power over other organizational members Author (year) Mentoring/mentorship de? nition(s) given in article Mentor de? nition(s) given in article Sponsor de? nition Dreher and Cox (1996) ) Mentoring in organizations has been de? ned as a developmental relationship b etween an ? ? individual (protege) and a more senior and in? uential manager or professional (mentor) 2) Focuses particularly on the career-support aspects of mentoring Ragins (1997) 1) One who serves as a role model, friend, and ? ? counsellor, who accepts and helps the protege develop a positive and secure self-image 2) An individual who holds a position senior to yours who takes an active interest in developing your career. While it is possible for your immediate supervisor to serve as a mentor, relationships of this type represent a special opportunity to interact with a senior manager.The standard subordinate/supervisor relationship is not a mentoring relationship (it is possible to have multiple mentors) 1) Individuals with advanced experience and knowledge who are committed to providing ? ? upward mobility and support to their proteges’ careers Covaleski et al. (1998) 1) Sometimes also called coaching or counselling 2) It involves relations between senior managers and junior employees, in which the latter can â€Å"become interwoven into an organization’s culture by efforts of the former, who, embodying the â€Å"core values that best promote desired organization culture,† help frame the inculcation process† as well as â€Å"help cultivate desired norms and values† 3) A technique by which junior members imbibe and interiorize the more subtle, tacit, and noncodi? ble aspects of an organization’s goals, which are embodied in superiors and with which they develop their new identi? es as ? rm members 1) A more senior person who takes an interest in sponsorship of the career of a more junior person (Kram, 1985) (continued) Scandura (1998) Mentoring and sponsoring 635 Table I. MD 42,5 636 Author (year) 1) The mentor is traditionally de? ned as a source ? ? of information for the protege and the positive outcomes, such as greater income and promotion opportunities Mullen and Noe (1999) Ragins et al. (2000) Higgins and Kram (2001) Table I. Mentor de? nition(s) given in article Sponsor de? nition 1) Generally de? ned as individuals with advanced experience and knowledge who are committed to providing upward mobility and ? career support to their proteges (Kram, 1985) 2) A higher-ranking, in? uential individual in your work environment who has advanced experience and knowledge and is committed to providing upward mobility and support to your career Mentoring/mentorship de? nition(s) given in article A mentoring relationship is a one-to-one relationship between a more experienced member (mentor) and a less experienced member ? ? (protege) of the organization or profession. The relationship is developed to promote the ? ? professional and personal growth of the protege through coaching, support, and guidance. Through individualized attention, the mentor transfers needed information, feedback, and ? encouragement to the protege as well as providing emotional support and â€Å"putting in a good wordâ⠂¬  when possible Formal mentoring was as follows: â€Å"In order to assist individuals in their development and advancement, some organizations have established formal mentoring programs, where ? ? proteges and mentors are linked in some way. This may be accomplished by assigning mentors or by just providing formal opportunities aimed at developing the relationship. To recap: formal mentoring relationships are developed with organizational assistance. Informal mentoring relationships are developed spontaneously, without organizational assistance† A â€Å"traditional† mentoring relationship is one in ? ? which a senior person working in the protege’s ? ? organization assists the protege’s personal and professional development probability that the mentor will provide both psychosocial and career support for the ? ? protege.This would explain why sponsoring has surfaced as being inherent to mentoring in both qualitative research (e. g. , Kram, 1980, 1983) and quantitative research (e. g. , Noe, 1988a; Scandura, 1992), thus being viewed as a sub-function of mentoring. However, if a mentor is conceptualized in its most simplest of terms – those used by Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary – a wise and trusted counselor or teacher; and likewise with a sponsor – a person who vouches for, is responsible for, or supports a person or makes a pledge or promise on behalf of another – then from the onset, the nature of the reporting relationships in Kram’s study (1980, 1983) moved the examined phenomenon beyond the realm of just a mentoring relationship. Moving beyond this de? ition of mentor, there are at least two additional rationales for why a sponsor should not be viewed as inherent in mentoring, in addition to not being used interchangeably with the term mentor. First, the derivations of the terms are disparate – mentor from the ? ? Latin word mentor, meaning to teach; and sponsor from the Lati n word spondere, meaning to pledge. Second, based on Webster’s New World Thesaurus, mentor and sponsor are not synonyms. So, while Kram (1980, 1983) did observe the presence of the sponsoring phenomenon in her study, it is argued that it should have been considered a distinct concept rather than being considered inherent in mentoring.Since the foundation upon which the original conceptualization of organizational mentoring was developed in a somewhat dubious context, it begs the question as to the interchangeable usage of the terms mentor and sponsor. Similarly, given the emergence of the concept coaching in the literature as a distinctly different developmental concept than mentoring, it is posited that sponsoring should re-emerge as a distinctly different developmental relationship worthy of as much examination in the organizational literature as has coaching. So, based on this ? rst argument, it is posited that sponsoring may be just as important as mentoring in the upward mobility of individuals in organizational settings (Kanter, 1977).Therefore, a paradigm shift and new lens through which to investigate and utilize mentoring and sponsoring in organizational settings are being presented. Mentoring and sponsoring 637 Universal de? nitions Given the review of the various de? nitions of mentor, mentoring, sponsor, and sponsoring that have been presented in the literature, to date, â€Å"explaining mentoring through a single, universal and prescriptive de? nition. . . [has proven to be] inadequate† (Gibb, 1994, p. 47). However, explaining mentoring through a single universal and descriptive de? nition is more than adequate. Such a de? nition is necessary to provide solid conceptual grounding, and a lens through which to further examine and utilize mentoring and sponsoring. Hence, this is an opportune juncture to advance universal de? itions of mentoring and sponsoring to be used and operationalized in any research or organizational context hence forth. The following universal de? nitions regarding the concepts of mentor, mentoring, and mentorships are offered: . a mentor is a wise and trusted counselor or teacher; . mentoring is the guidance process that takes place between a mentor and a ? ? protege; and . ? ? a mentorship is a mentoring relationship between a mentor and a protege. MD 42,5 638 Similarly, regarding the concepts of sponsor, sponsoring, and sponsorships, the following universal de? nitions are offered: . ? ? a sponsor is a person who nominates or supports another person’s (protege) promotion; . ? ? ponsoring is the process of a sponsor nominating or supporting a protege’s promotion; and . ? ? a sponsorship is a sponsoring relationship between a sponsor and a protege. It should be noted that these suggested universal de? nitions of mentor and sponsor ? ? connote that neither one has to be older than the protege, which is a deviation from the sometimes explicit and other times implicit de? nitions for both terms in the organizational mentoring literature. It should also be noted that a mentor does not ? ? always have to be an organizational success to provide the protege with valuable guidance. Additionally, these universal de? nitions are speci? , yet general enough to be applicable regardless of the profession in which they may be studied or the research question examined, which has been perceived to be a matter of contention (Chao, 1998). Therefore, these de? nitions of mentor and mentoring allow for many of the forms of mentoring examined in the literature to be viewed as types of mentoring. This is consistent with Higgins and Kram’s (2001, p. 264) assertion that they are exploring different types of mentoring in their recent article, which views â€Å"mentoring as a multiple developmental relationship phenomenon†. Formal and informal mentorships – argument two The second argument for reconceptualizing mentoring and sponsoring requires an examination of the literature on formal and informal mentorships.As previously stated, original theorizing of organizational mentoring, in large part, resulted from the examination of informal, intraorganizational mentorships (i. e. , Kram, 1980, 1983). These types of mentorships have been purported to be a key developmental tool in the upward mobility of individuals in organizations (Hunt and Michael, 1983; Kanter, 1977; Pittenger and Heimann, 2000; Ragins et al. , 2000). Many researchers believe that all those who succeed have mentors, usually informal mentors (Campion and Gold? nch, 1983; Collins and Scott, 1978; Kanter, 1977). It should also be noted that sponsors have been said to be important to those who succeed (Kanter, 1977; Dalton et al. 1977) although they have not been the focus of as much attention in the literature as have mentors. Unlike sponsorships, there are copious amounts of articles suggesting that both informal and formal mentorships exist within most organizations, with informal mentorships being the most prevalent (e. g. , Noe, 1998b, Phillips-Jones, 1982). Informal ? ? mentorships are mentoring relationships where the mentor and protege, on their own ? ? accord, agree that the protege will trust the mentor to counsel or teach him/her (Noe, 1988a, 1988b). Formal mentorships refer to mentoring relationships where a third party ? ? (usually the organization) sanctions an agreement between mentor and protege, ? whereby the protege should trust the mentor to counsel or teach him/her (Noe, 1988a, 1988b). Both informal and formal mentorships can be either intraorganizational or interorganizational relationships (Ragins, 1997). Intraorganizational mentorships refer ? ? to those mentoring relationships in which both the mentor and the protege are employed by the same organization. Interorganizational mentorships pertain to ? ? mentoring relationships where the mentor and protege are employed by different organizations. Similar to mentoring, based on the u niversal de? nitions of sponsor and sponsoring offered in this paper, sponsoring can be formal or informal, and can occur intraorganizationally or interorganizationally.Informal mentorships tend to germinate as a result of work or non-work issues that ? ? lead the mentor and protege to realize they have shared interests, admiration, and commitment, which makes informal mentorships more in-depth and personal (Chao et al. , 1992; Lawson, 1996; Noe, 1988b). Thus, informal mentorships are likely to move beyond the discussion of career-related issues to more personal issues (Chao et al. , 1992; Noe, 1988b). The following examples given in an excerpt taken from Kalb? eisch (2000, p. 58) symbolize and embody some of the characteristics of informal mentorships: ? ? At a corporate cocktail party the proud mentor shows off her protege to her colleagues. As ? she introduces her rising star, her protege follows her lead in smiling and moving through the ? ? crowd. The protege mirrors her mentor ’s moves as she smoothly joins conversations then ? ? skillfully continues on to other interactions. At the golf course a mentor brings his protege along as a â€Å"fourth† to make up for a missing member of a traditional Saturday morning golf ? ? quartet. The mentor tells his pals that his protege is â€Å"like a son to him† and that he will ? t right in to their game. Mentoring and sponsoring 639 These examples illustrate how interactions in informal mentorships tend to move outside the typical con? nes of the of? ce.As a result of work and non-work interactions, ? ? the mentor helps to in? uence and socialize the protege (Bahniuk and Kogler Hill, 1998; ? ? Noe, 1988a). In addition, the mentor provides the protege with support, guidance, and feedback as a result of his/her knowledge about how to get things done, â€Å"what’s what,† and â€Å"who’s who† (Bahniuk and Kogler Hill, 1998; Noe, 1988b; Veale and Wachtel, 1996). ? ? Therefo re, â€Å"proteges learn from their mentors. . . not only how to do their jobs better, but also how to manage their organizational careers better, and how to balance and manage their lives better† (Lawson, 1996, p. 6). As a consequence of the perceived bene? s of informal mentoring, formal mentoring programs began to surface in the early 1980s to provide mentoring to â€Å"more than just a lucky few† (Forret et al. , 1996, p. 6) in an effort to replicate and capitalize on the perceived bene? ts of informal mentoring (Bahniuk and Kogler Hill, 1998; Noe, 1988b; Ragins et al. , 2000). While many organizations have implemented formal mentoring programs, there has been a lack of agreement on the intent and extent to which they are formalized in organizations (Noe, 1988b). Therefore, it has been suggested that ? ? organizations should not expect proteges in formal mentorships to gain the same ? ? bene? ts as proteges in informal mentorships (Noe, 1988b).Regardless, many orga nizations have instituted some form of formalized mentoring in an effort to gain a competitive advantage in today’s global and dynamic marketplace (Pittenger and Heimann, 2000; Veale and Wachtel, 1996). Some characteristics of formal mentoring programs are: top management support; corporate mentoring strategy; prudent mentor ? ? ? ? and protege selection and matching processes; comprehensive mentor and protege ? ? orientation; clearly stated expectations and responsibilities of mentor and protege; and ? ? established duration and contact frequency between the mentor and protege (Friday and Friday, 2002; Noe, 1988b; Scandura, 1998). Although formal mentoring programs are designed to replicate and capitalize on the bene? s of informal mentoring (Bahniuk and Kogler Hill, 1998; Noe, 1988b; Ragins et al. , MD 42,5 640 2000), de? nite differences exist between them. Chao et al. (1992) suggest that the most notable differences between formal and informal mentorships begin with the i nitiation phase. The differences begin with the alteration of the voluntary nature from which informal mentorships evolve (Ragins, 1997). In formal mentoring programs, mentors ? ? and proteges are assigned (Chao et al. , 1992; Noe, 1988b; Scandura, 1998). The literature ? ? suggests that proteges may not perceive formal mentors as bene? cial as informal mentors. Numerous factors (e. g. , required participation, personality con? icts, perceptual con? cts, limited interaction, perceived pressure, lack of commitment and motivation, differences in expectations, lack of intimacy and perceived value, and ? ? sanctioned monitoring) contribute to formal proteges considering their mentors not to ? ? be as bene? cial as informal proteges consider their mentors (Chao et al. , 1992; Kram, 1985; Lee et al. , 2000; Noe, 1988b, Ragins et al. , 2000; Tepper, 1995). This perceived decrease in bene? t is likely the case because while formal mentors have been found to provide the same amount of psycho social support as informal mentors, they have not been found to provide the same amount of career support, which is usually an expected outcome of mentoring (Chao et al. , 1992; Noe, 1988a).As purported by Kram (1980, 1983), in naturally occurring, informal mentorships, ? ? mentors tend to provide both career and psychosocial support to their proteges. However, research suggests that in some informal mentorships and many formal mentorships, mentors tend to have dif? culty providing both types of support to their ? ? proteges, with the majority of the dif? culty being in providing career support (Bahniuk and Kogler Hill, 1998; Chao et al. , 1992; Noe, 1988b). Given the observance of dif? culty formal and informal mentors tend to experience in providing career support, ? ? particularly sponsorship, to their proteges, it lends support to the argument that mentoring and sponsoring are distinct phenomena.Consistent with Kram’s (1985) original conceptualization of â€Å"relationsh ip constellations† (in which multiple developmental relationships are not all provided by one individual) facilitating an individual in his/her upward mobility within the organization, mentoring and sponsoring are posited as distinct, but related, non-mutually exclusive developmental relationships. Thus, mentoring and sponsoring may be provided by the same individual, but it is not necessary or expected that they will both be provided by the ? ? same individual. Therefore, a mentor and a sponsor for a protege may be one in the same or they may be two different individuals. Kram’s (1985) work made the distinction â€Å". . . etween the classic mentoring relationship and other less involving, exclusive, and intricate types of relationships such as the sponsor relationship. . . † (Murrell and James, 2001). This distinction is likely to have contributed to the lack of importance given to the sponsor relationship and its potential in? uence on career advancement as co mpared to the attention given to the mentor relationship. Although the classic mentoring relationship, which is more psychosocial, has been found to enhance the competence and personal effectiveness of individuals trying to advance, it is the sponsor relationship that has shown to relate more closely to individuals actually advancing in organizations (Murrell and James, 2001).Thus, for aspiring executives developing career strategies it is suggested that mentors be selected when they need to enhance their competence and effectiveness on the job, and that sponsors be selected to assist them in advancing within the organization. Therefore, aspiring executives may use these two types of developmental relationships independently or concurrently at various stages of their careers based on their needs at that given point in time. Mentoring and sponsoring Conclusion Over the last three decades, much of the organizational mentoring research has conceptualized mentoring as the career and psy chosocial developmental support provided by a more senior individual to a more junior individual (Higgins and Kram, 2001; Kram, 1983).As outlined by Kram (1980, 1983), it has been suggested that only a subset of possible functions is provided by most mentors. Usually, providing upward ? ? mobility for the protege is not in the subset provided (Chao et al. , 1992; Kram, 1986; Noe, 1988b). This raises a question. If the mentor is providing all the other ? ? sub-functions, but not providing upward mobility for the protege, is this a mentoring relationship? According to the existing literature the answer would be: â€Å"Yes, but the ? ? mentor is just not sponsoring the protege; therefore, he/she is not a true mentor† according to Higgins and Kram (2001). They claim that a â€Å"true mentor† provides high ? ? amounts of both psychosocial and career support to his/her protege.On the other hand, according to the arguments posited in this paper, the answer would be â€Å"yes ,† and while the mentor is not a sponsor, he/she is a â€Å"true mentor† nonetheless. Some researchers have suggested that there is no one word that communicates what has been perceived in the literature to date as mentoring (Burke and McKeen, 1989; Levinson et al. , 1978). That may be the case because, to date, researchers have likely been examining at least two phenomena simultaneously, mentoring and sponsoring. The various de? nitions of mentor and mentoring, and the movement of mentoring into a formally structured arena have helped to highlight the distinction between mentoring and sponsoring as being distinct, non-mutually exclusive, and possibly non-concurrent phenomena.While scholars may have distinguished between mentors and sponsors (Kanter, 1977; it is being argued that as long as the concept of mentoring is viewed as ? ? encompassing the sponsoring of a protege’s nomination for promotion, the concept and its operationalization will lack clarity, and th us remain less scienti? cally supported than would be desired. Therefore, mentoring and sponsoring should be viewed as two distinctly different developmental relationships that are not necessarily mutually exclusive in terms of being performed by the same individual. Consequently, the terms mentor and sponsor, and mentoring and sponsoring should not be used interchangeably.With the assertion that there is no explicit agreement on which types of developmental experiences should be classi? ed as mentoring (Whitely et al. , 1992), the changing demographics in the workforce, and the global business milieu of this millennium, mentoring and sponsoring need to be reconceptualized (Higgins and Kram, 2001; Ragins, 1997). This paper has done just that; it has reconceptualized mentoring and sponsoring to account for the infusion of new dynamics that have arisen, and that are likely to arise, since the initial conceptualizing and theorizing of the terms in the organizational literature dating b ack at least three decades ago (e. g. Collins and Scott, 1978; Kanter, 1977; Lawson, 1996; Roche, 1979). If mentoring and sponsoring are to be considered enduring scienti? c phenomena, their de? nitions and operationalizations should not change every time environmental or organizational dynamics change or by different users of the terms (e. g. , researchers, practitioners, etc). 641 MD 42,5 642 The universal de? nitions offered in this paper are considered enduring. Regardless of the research or organizational environment and its dynamics, these universal de? nitions will not need to be changed, thereby allowing for consistency in the de? nitions and operationalizations of mentoring and sponsoring in future research and practice.Given the two lucid arguments presented, strong evidence exists to warrant the future use of these new lens through which to view and examine mentoring and sponsoring in organizational settings. In conclusion, aspiring executives have new information, which can help them develop a more effective career enhancement strategy that includes both mentors and sponsors. References Bahniuk, M. H. and Kogler Hill, S. (1998), â€Å"Promoting career success through mentoring†, Review of Business, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 4-7. Burke, R. J. and McKeen, C. A. (1989), â€Å"Mentoring in organizations: implications for women†, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 9, pp. 317-32. Cabell, D. W. E. (2001), Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Management: 2001-2002, Cabell Publishing Co. , Beaumont, TX. Campion, M. A. and Gold? nch, J. R. 1983), â€Å"Mentoring among hospital administrators†, Hospital and Heath Services Administration, Vol. 28, pp. 77-93. Chao, G. T. (1998), â€Å"Challenging research in mentoring†, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 333-8. Chao, G. T. , Walz, P. M. and Gardner, P. D. (1992), â€Å"Formal and informal mentorships: a comparison on mentoring functions and contrast w ith nonmentored counterparts†, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 619-36. Clawson, J. (1979), â€Å" Superior-subordinate relationships for managerial development†, doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA. Collins, E. G. and Scott, P. (1978), â€Å"Everyone who makes it has a mentor†, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 56, pp. 89-101.Covaleski, M. , Dirsmith, M. , Heian, J. and Samuel, S. (1998), â€Å"The calculated and the avowed: techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six accounting ? rms†, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 293-327. Dalton, G. W. , Thompson, P. H. and Price, R. L. (1977), â€Å"The four stages of professional careers – a new look at performance by professional†, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 19-42. Dreher, G. F. and Cox, T. H. (1996), â€Å"Race, gender and opportunity: a study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationshi ps†, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, pp. 297-308. ? ? Fagenson, E. A. 1989), â€Å"The mentor advantage: perceived career/job experiences of proteges ? ? versus non-proteges†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 309-20. Forret, M. L. , Turban, D. B. and Dougherty, T. W. (1996), â€Å"Issues facing organizations when implementing formal mentoring programmes†, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 27-30. Friday, E. and Friday, S. S. (2002), â€Å"Formal mentoring: is there a strategic ? t? †, Management Decision, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 152-7. Gibb, S. (1994), â€Å"Inside corporate mentoring schemes: the development of a conceptual framework†, Personnel Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 47-60. Gibb, S. and Megginson, D. 1993), â€Å"Inside corporate mentoring schemes: a new agenda of concerns†, Personnel Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 40-54. Higgins, M. C. and Kram, K. E. (2001), â€Å"Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: a developmental network perspective†, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 264-88. Hunt, D. M. and Michael, C. (1983), â€Å"Mentorship: a career training and development tool†, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8, pp. 475-85. Jacobi, M. (1991), â€Å"Mentoring an undergraduate academic success: a literature review†, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 61, pp. 505-32. Kalb? eisch, P. J. (2000), â€Å"Similarity and attraction in business and academic environments: same and cross-sex mentoring relationships†, Review of Business, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 58-61. Kanter, R. M. (1977), Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York, NY. Kelly, M. J. (2001), â€Å"Management mentoring in a social service organization†, Administration in Social Work, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 17-33. Kram, K. E. (1980), â€Å"Mentoring processes at work: developing relationships in managerial careers†, doctoral dissertation, Yale Universit y, New Haven, CT. Kram, K. E. (1983), â€Å"Phases of the mentor relationship†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 608-25. Kram, K. E. (1985), Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL. Kram, K. E. and Isabella, L. A. 1985), â€Å"Mentoring alternatives: the role of peer relationships in career development†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 110-32. Lawson, J. G. (1996), â€Å"Mentoring in the Information age†, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. p6-15. Lee, F. K. , Dougherty, T. W. and Turban, D. B. (2000), â€Å"The role of personality and work values in mentoring programs†, Review of Business, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 33-7. Levinson, D. J. , Darrow, C. N. , Klein, E. B. , Levinson, M. A. and McKee, B. (1978), Seasons of a Man’s Life. , Knopf, New York, NY. Minter, R. L. and Thomas, E. G. (2000), â€Å"Employee development through coaching, ment oring, and counseling: a multidimensional approach†, Review of Business, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 43-7.Mullen, E. J. (1998), â€Å"Vocational and psychological mentoring functions: identifying mentors who serve both†, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 319-31. Mullen, E. J. and Noe, R. A. (1999), â€Å"The mentoring information exchange: when do mentors seek ? ? information from proteges? †, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 233-42. Murrell, A. J. and James, E. H. (2001), â€Å"Gender and diversity in organizations: past, present, and future directions†, Sex Roles, Vol. 45 No. 5/6, pp. 243-57. Noe, R. A. (1988a), â€Å"Women and mentoring: a review and research agenda†, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 65-78. Noe, R. A. 1988b), â€Å"An investigation of the determinants of successfully assigned mentoring relationship†, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 41, pp. 457-79. Pittenger, K. K. S. and Heimann, B. A. (2000), â€Å"Building effective mentoring relationships†, Review of Business, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 38-42. ? ? Phillips, L. L. (1977), â€Å"Mentors and proteges: a study of the career development of women managers and executives in business and industry†, doctoral dissertation, University Micro? lms International No. 78-6517, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. ? ? Phillips-Jones, L. L. (1982), Mentors and Proteges, Arbor House, New York, NY. Mentoring and sponsoring 643 MD 42,5 644 Ragins, B. R. (1997), â€Å"Diversi? d mentoring relationships in organizations: a power perspective†, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, pp. 482-521. Ragins, B. R. and Cotton, J. L. (1993), â€Å"Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations†, Journal of Management, Vol. 19, pp. 97-111. Ragins, B. R. and Scandura, T. A. (1994), â€Å"Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 957-71. Ragins, B. R. , Cott on, J. L. and Miller, J. S. (2000), â€Å"Marginal mentoring: the effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design of work and career attitudes†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1177-201. Roche, G. R. 1979), â€Å"Much ado about mentors†, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 59, pp. 14-18. Scandura, T. A. (1992), â€Å"Mentoring and career mobility: an empirical investigation†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 169-74. Scandura, T. A. (1998), â€Å"Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes†, Journal of Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 449-67. Scandura, T. A. and Schriesheim, C. (1994), â€Å"Leader-member exchange (LMX) & supervisor career mentoring (SCM) as complementary constructs in leadership research†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 1588-602. Shapiro, E. , Haseltine, F. and Rowe, M. (1978), â€Å"Moving up: role models, mentors, and the ‘patron system. †, Sloan, Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 51-8. Simonetti, J. L. , Ariss, S. and Martinez, J. (1999), â€Å"Through the top with mentoring†, Business Horizons, Vol. 42 No. 6, pp. 54-63. Tepper, B. J. (1995), â€Å"Upward maintenance tactics in supervisory mentoring and nonmentoring relationships†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 1191-205. Thomas, D. A. (1993), â€Å"Racial dynamics in cross-race developmental relationships†, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 169-94. ? ? Turban, D. B. and Dougherty, T. (1994), â€Å"Role of protege personality in receipt of mentoring and career success†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 88-702. Veale, D. J. and Wachtel, J. M. (1996), â€Å"Mentoring and coaching as part of a human resource development strategy: an ex at Coca-Cola Foods†, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 16-20. Whitely, W. , Dougherty, T. W. and Dreher, G. F . (1991), â€Å"Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers and professionals early career progress†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 331-51. Whitely, W. , Dougherty, T. W. and Dreher, G. F. (1992), â€Å"Correlates of career-oriented mentoring for early career managers and professionals†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 141-54.

From dependence to independence Essay

From dependence to independence – To what degree does Jo mature during the play and become less dependent on other people? Jo was a naà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ve young schoolgirl, dependent on her unreliable mother Helen, never knowing her father. She was trapped between school, her mother and grotty little bedsits, never really having an outside life. This kept her young, so she was often childish and had a fear of the dark. Jo was desperate to leave her mother and spread her wings. Her life is a roller coaster and the play shows her life with its ups and downs. From meeting the black sailor, to getting ready to give birth, we see her mature and become independent. In Act 1, Scene 1, we find out about Jo’s schooling and talents. When she arrives, she wants to find somewhere to plant her bulbs. As she says, â€Å"It’s nice to see a few flowers.† Helen also finds some drawings that Jo had done and gives her a rare compliment by saying, â€Å"I didn’t realise I had such a talented daughter.† Jo replies by saying, â€Å"I’m not just talented, I’m geniused.† Jo is also intent of leaving school – and Helen – at Christmas. She seems to think that she is mature enough to do so. She hates the flat and when Helen says, â€Å"This is the place,† Jo replies, â€Å"And I don’t like it.† She hates life and doesn’t realise how good it can be because she is always on the move. She also seems lonely. This is most likely because she is never in one place long enough to make any friends. Her mother gives her very little support so she must seek affection from other sources. She is sarcastic, but witty and is always answering Helen back. Although she seems to hate Helen, Jo is very dependent on her and – to a certain extent – Helen is dependent on Jo. She is always making Jo do things for her (getting drinks, cooking, etc). Jo and Helen are mother and daughter but someone who didn’t know them, might think that they were strangers that abhorred each other. The pair are constantly bickering and Jo even says, â€Å"I’m sick of you. You’ve made my life a misery.† Jo blames Helen for her misfortune and, in truth; most of it is Helen’s fault. There is no typical mother / daughter relationship between them. They mainly communicate through bickering and rasied voices. Jo is desperate to leave her mother as soon as she has the chance. The teenager is always criticising Helen and vice versa, although Jo does a lot more, for example, â€Å"You’re knocking it back worse than ever.† Jo never calls Helen ‘mother’. This is probably because Helen never acted like mother and cared for her daughter like a mother should. Even Helen says, â€Å"I know, I’m a cruel, wicked woman,† not using the word ‘mother’. Towards the end of the play, Helen comes back to live with Jo. The readers then think that she has decided to be a good mother before her child deserts her. Instead we see that Peter has thrown her out and Helen has become the dependant party, not Jo. There is total role reversal here as Jo has matured but Helen is immature – perhaps naà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ve – thinking that she can just move back in with Jo and return everything back to how it was. Peter is a brash car salesman with an eye patch. Helen moved again to get away from him but he tracked her down. He wants her to marry him but Helen declines the first time but agrees when he persists. Jo seems to hate him and even asks if he’s already married. She seems spiteful and full of hatred towards Peter. They are both fighting for Helen’s love. Jo asks Peter, â€Å"Do you fancy me?† and he responds, â€Å"Not yet.† He also has photographs of all his ex-girlfriends. Jo teases him quite a bit, asking about his eye and why he’s marrying Helen. Jo also has a fear of the dark, â€Å"I’m not frightened of the darkness outside. It’s the darkness inside I don’t like.† This could be that she is only scared of her future and not what’s happening to everyone else. Jo lives in a poor, sad life and her needs are not important to Helen and the terrible mother neglects Jo a lot, for example, leaving her alone for a weekend while she runs off with Peter. Helen also makes no attempt to help Jo when she’s pregnant. Because of the lack of motherly love, Jo is determined to become independent. She plans to move out, get a job and marry a black sailor. Her mother disapproves but that makes Jo even more single-minded. She is only sixteen so we see that she is pretty independent for her age. She is growing less dependant on Helen, which is a good thing. Readers may think that she is doing this because she has realised that Helen will never love her as much as her many boyfriends. Jo had a brief love affair with a black sailor. Readers never find out his name but Jo calls him Jimmie. It is a quick relationship as he has to leave but the relationship is quite odd. They both say that they love each other but are very relaxed with each other and Jo doesn’t seem to care that he doesn’t come back. Jimmie offers quite a lot of comfort. He is older than Jo and they could move in together if he wasn’t always on the move. He also asks Jo to marry him. She jumps at the opportunity, probably because it means she can leave Helen. As I said, Jo appears to love the sailor but doesn’t expect him to return and doesn’t panic when there’s no sign of him. This could be because her life is so bad anyway, that she becomes pessimistic and doesn’t expect her life to improve in any way. She has had her taste of honey and it has gone forever. Her ideas about him do change. Jo says, â€Å"Last Christmas I had him,† and she realises that she loves and misses him but only when the baby is due. It seems to her that it was all a dream and she can’t remember the reality. The trouble is, the dream left her pregnant with an unintended baby so it must be real. While Helen’s away, Jo meets Geoff, a gay, art student and the pair move in together, without Helen knowing. In today’s society, there is nothing wrong with this but homosexuals were frowned upon in the 1950’s. Geoff is an ideal best friend for Jo. She is no longer dependent on Helen but is instead dependent on Geoff, probably more than she was on her mother. Jo even says, supposedly to the baby, â€Å"Let’s see what big sisters making us.† Geoff is a friendly carer and is totally different from the sailor. Whereas the sailor wants a sexual relationship, Geoff is content with caring for Jo and making cakes. Geoff even asks Jo if they should get married and also asks her what she’d do if he started something. Jo replies, â€Å"In my condition, I’d probably faint.† He adores babies but Jo is less keen on them. Geoff seems to want, more than anything, to be the father of Jo’s child. To begin with, Jo treats Geoff with little respect, joking around and saying things that could hurt him. As their relationship progresses and they get to know each other better, Jo respects Geoff more and more. Jo eventually realises that the baby will need a father figure and decides to let Geoff stay, but they wouldn’t get married. Jo has mixed feelings about becoming a mother. She is intent on keeping the baby at first because she thinks it is cruel to have them aborted. She does, though, have some doubts. For example, she doesn’t want to breast feed her baby. Geoff brings her a doll to practice holds on. She says the colour’s wrong – the father being black – and explodes. She screams, â€Å"I’ll bash its brains out! I’ll kill it! I don’t want to be a mother,† which makes us think that she may have an abortion after all. Previously though, the baby kicked her and she was overwhelmed. All of these details then leave us wondering if she is ready for motherhood. It is more likely that she is ready to become a mother because she has matured a lot since the beginning of the play when she was dependant on Helen. As the play progresses, we see Jo turn from a naà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ve young girl to a mature woman. She is no longer dependant on anyone and, although she is probably destined to a life living in small flats and houses, the prospects are bright and, as she sings at the very end, a glimmer of hope shines through and we think she may have a happy life.

Argumentative Essay

I believe the novel is a far superior experience In comparison to the movie. The Outsiders gives you a better insight Into the characters thoughts and feelings. As the reader, you also gain knowledge through foreshadowing and flashbacks, which Is not hinted In the movie. In addition to the written literary elements, the novel Is described In great detail and gives you a deeper understanding of It. One major advantage of reading a novel rather than watching a movie Is that you get a much better view of how each character feels and their thoughts.For example, In the novel, The Outsiders, the narrator gives readers tremendous Insight Into pony's emotions, feelings, and thoughts. You understand his great fear of the Soc and why Johnny always carries a switchblade with him for protection. The reader learns how Pony feels about the gang and why he believes he is different from the rest. During the time Johnny and Pony are at the church, you also experience the emotions they both go through over Bob's death. When Dally and Johnny die you know exactly how Pony feels, creating a feeling of sympathy towards him.In addition to gaining a better perspective of the characters, the reader gains the effects of foreshadowing and flashbacks as well. The author foreshadows Dally death in the novel, hinting that he does not care if he dies, because Johnny was one of the few people he truly cared about. Flashbacks are also key points in the novel, The Outsiders. In the beginning, the flashback about how badly Johnny was beaten by the Soc explains why he fears them so much. Johnny also threatens to kill anyone who tries to jump him again, foreshadowing Bob Sheldon death.Other minor leasebacks, like Pony telling Cherry about Stopgap's horse Mackey Mouse, are not as important but gives you knowledge about the characters, one thing you do not see in the movie. Perhaps the most important factor is that the novel is much more descriptive than the movie. At the beginning of the novel ther e are very detailed descriptions of each character giving you a vivid idea of what they look like but also giving you the freedom to imagine them how you want. The novel also gives your Imagination control of how you think things should look like, whereas the movie does not.The efferent settings for The Outsiders are always explained In great detail helping you to picture the settings better. The author's descriptions give you Insight Into how they believed each character should look and what the settings are like, allowing you to picture exactly what the author was Imagining when they wrote the novel. In conclusion, I believe the novel, The Outsiders, Is much better than watching the movie. With the novel you understand the character's thoughts and how they feel and you learn even more about each character through literary elements and the author's descriptive writing.I believe the novel is a far superior experience in comparison to the movie. The Outsiders gives you a better insig ht into the characters thoughts and feelings. As the reader, you also gain knowledge through foreshadowing and flashbacks, which is not hinted in the movie. In addition to the written literary elements, the novel is described in great detail and gives you a deeper understanding of it. One major advantage of reading a novel rather than watching a movie is that you in the novel, The Outsiders, the narrator gives readers tremendous insight into Pony's emotions, feelings, and thoughts.You understand his great fear of the Soc effects of foreshadowing and flashbacks as well. The author foreshadows Dally who tries to Jump him again, foreshadowing Bob Sheldon death. Other minor freedom to imagine them how you want. The novel also gives your imagination different settings for The Outsiders are always explained in great detail helping you to picture the settings better. The author's descriptions give you insight into how they picture exactly what the author was imagining when they wrote the n ovel. In conclusion, I believe the novel. Argumentative Essay Arts The United States, as a whole, depends immensely on the development of arts programs, big or small. Americans need the sense of culture and social gathering, and what could possibly be better to do on a Friday night than hear the local orchestra play or catch the next town over's middle school production of The Wizard of Oz?The funding of arts departments In schools, colleges, and universities Is absolutely imperative to the united States in more than one way: the arts condone a universal language spoken and understood by all, help US citizens to develop and define culture, and provide a necessary outlet to every age group across the country. First of all, the arts foster a universal language that no other program or department of study can compete with.Van Sago's Starry Night Is Just as meaningful in Venice, Italy as it Is In Tokyo, Japan; each part of the arts has the ability astound and create beauty anywhere and everywhere despite language, race, nationality, gender, and edu cation. A common argument for the funding of the arts is that the arts are a â€Å"public good† and provide service that simply exists and shouldn't have to be paid for. While sometimes the arts don't offer this service themselves, they offer social services that do.This long-used argument complements â€Å"the Idea that the arts benefited those beyond their direct consumers through the channels of national prestige, heritage preservation. And education† (Saunders 594). The prominence of the arts all over the world is a justifiable reason for giving every last person a basic knowledge and understanding of the arts. Defending arts departments across America is not the right way to go about doing this.Funding the arts' should be radically important to Americans due to the effect the arts programs and their participants have on the American culture. While culture seems travail to many, Its' development actually has a vast and underrepresented direct effect on the nation's pride. Questioned pride only leads to problematic questioning of loyalty, terrorism, and patriotism, and those are issues no country wants to deal with.Obviously, in no way does funding of the arts directly affect one's loyalty to their country, but the development of a country's culture does usually help to prevent a lack of patriotism In G' citizens. In an Interview with Bill Vive, the chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts, Vive states that he â€Å"thinks that a federal agency has to connect with the complexity of the society It serves†¦ Some of that complexity is multiplicity of cultural traditions† (â€Å"The Populist Promise†). Finally, the arts are a creative outlet for a multitude of people, young and old, across America.For example, a young boy experiencing abuse at home can let out all is frustrations with a paintbrush, or an aging teacher struggling to keep a Job may find stress relief in the violin's sweet sound, but either way, frustration, stress, confusion, and discomfort are all exposed and abandoned In the light of these and high school (where students can choose) art classes, bands, and choirs, kids become exposed to this outlet, and while not all of them find the arts suitable, many do. â€Å"Studies have shown that 90 percent or more of secondary schools offer instruction in music or the visual arts.The fact that about half (or slightly less) of the dents choose to take such courses is a measure of how students gauge their interests† (Goldman). Even struggling, stressed adults can find peace in a bar of Mozart or be on the edge of their seat to a Rachmaninoff prelude. Therefore, it is a most essential outlet to society. â€Å"While no one questions the innate value of being able to paint a pleasing picture, play an instrument or sing, it is also true that being unable to read, write or do math is more likely to lead to low- skilled labor, unemployment and consequent poverty' (Goldman).It's true that whe n it comes to acquiring a well-paying, reasonable Job in society, it's more logical for a student to understand basics like reading, writing, and mathematics. The important thing to note here is that it is not a question of either, or. It is a question of balancing and balancing evenly so that each student has the opportunities they need to succeed. In Barbara Standard's 1995 Harvard University speech, she says, â€Å"The far right is waging a war for the soul of America by making art a partisan issue and by trying to cut these arts orgasm,which bring culture, education, and Joy into the lives of ordinary Americans.They are hurting the very people they claim to represent† (Brooks). She says this because the arts are much, much more than a political issue that surfaces once or twice every so many years. Its the backbone of culture around the world, its the universal language that is naturally understood, and it its the outlet of the everyday citizen. There is no program more i nfluential to our society than the arts, and how America funds this program should directly reflect that. Argumentative essay Companies should reduce working hours for their employees, because It can bring benefits. Such as, Increase labor productivity, solving social and environmental problems, and making people's life happier and healthier. Supporting details: 1 . Reducing work hours can create productivity. Workers or employees can be more focus on their task or business without wasting time, and higher efficiency of production could create more profits for companies. 2. Reduction of working ours might trend to reduce absences and sick notes, so that it could save social spending.In addition, people who are employed can be more flexible on arrange their transportation, instead of driving, they will more likely tend to use echo-friendly transportations, like bicycle, walking by foots. 3. People can spend more time with their family or their hobbies, which can reduce the risk of getting psychological problem. And smaller working hours also reduce the Industrial disease. Introduction. Do you usually feel di zzy. No concentration and unable to work at the last hour before oh get off work? Are you bored by having a long time working day without doing anything? I guess most of people will answer yes'.Even though, the land founder of America had envisioned that people can have a lot of time to do what they want and many people followed up to maintain it. You must admit that today there are more and more people's life are occupied by endless working and it trend to be normal. However, things are not unchangeable, a recent discover discloses that less work hours can Increase productivity when hold salary constant, and people have started o experiment this theory in some counties. It means the endless work perhaps will be terminated In the future. According to Atonal Rasher who works for telegraph. O. UK, said that a Swedish city Is testing a new policy In order to Increase productivity and reduce social spending by cutting down the work hours from 8 to 6 per a day. Base on their arrangement, a tested group which is hundreds of civilians who work in a compass department work 6 hours per day versus an observational group that is other employees who still maintain 8 work hours daily. Then, the searcher will compare and analyze result of two groups after a certain period. Anna Coot, head of Social policy, has been full of confidence that this experiment will be as successful as they expect.However, the local opposite party are not buying it, they claim that it's Just a poor technique that governing party are trying to win support from workers before election. In addition, they point out there is other Swedish city Koruna, and Its district council are used to be testing six hour work day within a group of people who work In a government department, but this experiment re failed and cancelled In 2005, because they found It not make any situation better that before, conversely, people form other department become jealous of them. Introversion topic. Even though, there are som e researches show that less work hour results higher productivity, it's not always true. In my opinion, I believe that reducing work hour for employees is beneficial for our society. For example, increasing labor productivity, solving social and environmental problems, and making people's life happier and healthier. Body paragraph 1 James Coursework, who are the Journalist of New York Time, claimed that long time working can diminish labor marginal production in both quantity and quality.In factory, longtime work will increase the chance of errors and dangerous; equally, for people who are working in the office, longer work hour make them exhausted and they will have bad performance on their Job. According to Alexandra Michel, a former Goldman Cash. Overworked people cannot doing their Job nicely and quickly, and if they are keeping overwork, they will become even worse and slower.In addition, overworked people usually suffer from depression, aspiration, and sickness, and their abil ities of creativity and assessment are declined. I think those claims are accurately pointed the harm of overwork, as all we know each human has a biological limitation. If we exceed this boundary to work by consuming extra biological energy, the loss will be much more than earn. That is the reason why some of my classmates who give up the time to sleep and study overnight before taking exam do not receive highest grade in the class. Argumentative Essay SULA This essay is a compare and contrast of the character’s Sula and Nel from the novel ‘‘Sula’’ by Toni Morrison. Throughout the progression of the novel, Nel and Sula complement each other in    ways that allows them to form a single functional unit friendship. The symbiotic nature between Sula and Nel began during their childhood years. Sula depended upon Nel for sturdiness and comfort, while Nel preferred the unpredictable nature of her sula. They used the other's lifestyle to compensate for their shortcomings by placing themselves in the other's surroundings.When Sula visited Nel's home, Nel, who loved the oppressive neatness with dread, felt comfortable in it, with Sula. In the same way, Sula found comfort within the walls of the Wright’s home. They took solace in each other's presence. Each one found comfort in what the other finds bothersome. Sula dislikes her disheveled house, and wishes that she could live in the clean house of Nel 's. Nel likes the homeliness of Sula's house. As their relationship progressed, they began to act as an individual, or a symbiotic relationship where associations are peaceful cooperation’s between two entirely different types of organisms.Dependent describes the friend's relationship, because they depended on each other for everything. Sula and Nel's friendship, was as intense as it was sudden. They found relief in each other's personality, because they find their comfort in each other's environment. When Sula accidentally killed the boy named Chicken Little by throwing him into a river, Nel stuck by Sula. They both took responsibility for the accident, even though Sula was the only participant. At Chicken Little's funeral, Sula and Nel held hands and knew that only the coffin would lie in the earth; the bubbly laughter would stay aboveground with them forever.Their relationship up to this point, is a coexistence of happiness with each other. The Unhealthy Relationship of Su la and Nel  is that they rely on one another for their well being. However, sometimes those organisms become greedy and decide to take in the relationship, instead of sharing with their symbiotic partner. Through this action, it takes on parasitic characteristics. In  Toni Morrison's work,  Sula, Sula Peace and Nel Wright demonstrate how a symbiotic  relationship goes awry. When one partner betrays the other, by taking instead of giving, the other partner suffers.Nel and Sula's relationship suffers because Sula unfortunately takes actions that lead to partaking in a parasitic relationship where she begins to wither away. Nel refuses the parasitic lifestyle and relationship, which causes Sula to wither away. In the midst of her death, Sula finally realizes that she needs the symbiotic relationship with Nel to survive. The interactions between Sula and Nel began symbiotically; however, it develops into a parasitic one with the dependence of Sula on Nel. Argumentative Essay EJ Barr Mrs. Rhonda Crombie English 1101 12-11-12 Why Cigarette Smoking Should Be Banned The idea of cigarettes being banned has been an ongoing topic for the past thirty years. Many people believe that smoking cigarettes is a disgusting and dangerous habit and that it should be made illegal, and I am one of those people. Smoking is dangerous to a person's health, people around them, and also to their pockets. Cigarette smoking is very unattractive and unhealthy to other people.Smokers create unpleasant smells to themselves and everything they own. Smoking also dulls and ages a smoker's appearance by creating premature wrinkles, yellow teeth, bad breath, yellow fingernails, and the annoying â€Å"smoker’s cough†. Also, there is concern today about passive smoking. Recent research has shown that non-smokers can suffer health problems if they spend long periods of time among people who do smoke. Cigarette smoking is, obviously, a dangerous habit that can kill you.Smoking creates many harmful diseases such as lung cancer, emphysema, heart cancer, and many more deadly diseases. The 2,000 known poisons in cigarettes, such as tar, carbon, and rat poison, are the contributors to the many diseases a smoker attains. Also, cigarette smoking is extremely addictive. Nicotine, the chemical in cigarettes that make them so addictive, is a colorless, odorless oily substance that occurs naturally in nature. It is proven that nicotine damages your brain right after the first time a person smokes because of the receptors in it.Not only does it damage the brain, it can potentially damage a person's whole life. A person can face cancer, a deathly disease just becuase they are addicted to a cigarette, which is such a crazy concept to me. While being harmful to themselves, smoker's run a risk of harming others around them while they smoke. Second hand smoke victims are just as vunerable to many of these diseases as the smoker themselves. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has found that tobacco smoke contains 7,000 chemical compounds.More than 250 of those are known to be harmful, and of those, at least 69 of those are known to cause cancer. (2) There is also evidence that second hand smoke may be linked to childhood leukemia, and cancer of the larynx, pharynx, brain, bladder, rectum, and stomach. Second hand smoking is neither fair nor healthy for any of the parties involved. If smokers have the choice to slowly kill themselves, then the people around them that are affected should have a choice whether or not they breathe in someone else's smoke.Cigarette smoking is also very expensive to the smoker and their family. A pack of twenty-five cigarettes averages around four dollars. (1) If a smoker smokes a pack per day he or she will spend around 1,500 dollars per year, and roughly 15,000 dollars every ten years. With that kind of money, a smoker could almost have enough to buy themselves a new car! Also, a smoker is more likely to ca tch colds, the flu, and other respiratory infections. That means more trips to the doctor and more money spent.In conclusion, cigarette smoking helps no one, does not add to our society in any positive way, and it slowly kills people. Cigarettes also cause discomfort for people who have to be around it, and it can be harmful to the health of those who are not even smoking at all. Because of all these reasons, I believe that smoking cigarettes should be made illegal. Everything about this past time is harmful and has no use. Cigarettes should be put down by everyone in our nation, and better lifestyles and past times should be picked up. Argumentative Essay Our Generation Has Become Overly Dependent On Technology With the creation of technology, I’m beginning to wonder if it’s a good or bad idea to be so dependent on technology. People are on their cell phones, ipads, tablets or computers constantly. People are so obsessed with their phones that they even text someone in the same room. Do people need to be entertained every hour of the day? For some, technology is very addictive. They have to run out and purchase the latest gadget as soon as it comes out.I hardly see anyone read a book these days; they listen to audio books or read books online. Before technology, people actually wrote each other and met in person. Now they talk via Skype, Facetime or text messages. We have become a society handicapped by technology. Like so many people, I don’t know very many people’s numbers by heart anymore because we rely on our contact list on our cell phones. Lord forbid we lose our cells; we would be lost. There is no escape from technology, unless one lives under a rock.We check our phones for missed calls and messages consistently. We check emails, twitter and facebook to make sure we haven’t missed the latest status updates. By the middle of the day, we have already been exposed to multiple forms of technology. The sixties generation where I come from just can't help but wonder, have we gone too far? I don't mean, have we gone too far with the development of technology. It's very beneficial to advance technologically as a nation. Even I realize that.But I think we've gone too far in allowing our children to depend on computers and other devices to do their work and research for them. Many children and young adults depend on the Internet to figure out answers on their homework or just daily questions about life. The internet is a great source for information, but taking the easy route too often can result in bad habits. People don't go to the library to do research anymore, they simply u se Google. Many people can't even do basic math without a calculator.We have already become too reliant on  technology. Also, with social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter,  cyberbullying has become a reoccurring issue that is becoming much harder to end. We shouldn't let kids get too accustomed to using technology to solve their problems. It takes away their creativity. One can pretty much find anything on the Internet these days. Even parents will go on the Internet to search recipes or new ways in decorating a house or many other things.Some parents are even relying heavily on television and video-games to entertain their children so they don’t have to. I call this the lazy parent way of parenting. If we have a major black-out or world crisis, it will be interesting to see how people survive without technology. No one will be able to do anything for themselves because they have been relying on technology for so long. I hope everyone considers how much time techno logy has consumed their life, and take at least 10% of that time and spend it on someone or something important that can benefit them and others. Argumentative Essay SULA This essay is a compare and contrast of the character’s Sula and Nel from the novel ‘‘Sula’’ by Toni Morrison. Throughout the progression of the novel, Nel and Sula complement each other in    ways that allows them to form a single functional unit friendship. The symbiotic nature between Sula and Nel began during their childhood years. Sula depended upon Nel for sturdiness and comfort, while Nel preferred the unpredictable nature of her sula. They used the other's lifestyle to compensate for their shortcomings by placing themselves in the other's surroundings.When Sula visited Nel's home, Nel, who loved the oppressive neatness with dread, felt comfortable in it, with Sula. In the same way, Sula found comfort within the walls of the Wright’s home. They took solace in each other's presence. Each one found comfort in what the other finds bothersome. Sula dislikes her disheveled house, and wishes that she could live in the clean house of Nel 's. Nel likes the homeliness of Sula's house. As their relationship progressed, they began to act as an individual, or a symbiotic relationship where associations are peaceful cooperation’s between two entirely different types of organisms.Dependent describes the friend's relationship, because they depended on each other for everything. Sula and Nel's friendship, was as intense as it was sudden. They found relief in each other's personality, because they find their comfort in each other's environment. When Sula accidentally killed the boy named Chicken Little by throwing him into a river, Nel stuck by Sula. They both took responsibility for the accident, even though Sula was the only participant. At Chicken Little's funeral, Sula and Nel held hands and knew that only the coffin would lie in the earth; the bubbly laughter would stay aboveground with them forever.Their relationship up to this point, is a coexistence of happiness with each other. The Unhealthy Relationship of Su la and Nel  is that they rely on one another for their well being. However, sometimes those organisms become greedy and decide to take in the relationship, instead of sharing with their symbiotic partner. Through this action, it takes on parasitic characteristics. In  Toni Morrison's work,  Sula, Sula Peace and Nel Wright demonstrate how a symbiotic  relationship goes awry. When one partner betrays the other, by taking instead of giving, the other partner suffers.Nel and Sula's relationship suffers because Sula unfortunately takes actions that lead to partaking in a parasitic relationship where she begins to wither away. Nel refuses the parasitic lifestyle and relationship, which causes Sula to wither away. In the midst of her death, Sula finally realizes that she needs the symbiotic relationship with Nel to survive. The interactions between Sula and Nel began symbiotically; however, it develops into a parasitic one with the dependence of Sula on Nel. Argumentative Essay SULA This essay is a compare and contrast of the character’s Sula and Nel from the novel ‘‘Sula’’ by Toni Morrison. Throughout the progression of the novel, Nel and Sula complement each other in    ways that allows them to form a single functional unit friendship. The symbiotic nature between Sula and Nel began during their childhood years. Sula depended upon Nel for sturdiness and comfort, while Nel preferred the unpredictable nature of her sula. They used the other's lifestyle to compensate for their shortcomings by placing themselves in the other's surroundings.When Sula visited Nel's home, Nel, who loved the oppressive neatness with dread, felt comfortable in it, with Sula. In the same way, Sula found comfort within the walls of the Wright’s home. They took solace in each other's presence. Each one found comfort in what the other finds bothersome. Sula dislikes her disheveled house, and wishes that she could live in the clean house of Nel 's. Nel likes the homeliness of Sula's house. As their relationship progressed, they began to act as an individual, or a symbiotic relationship where associations are peaceful cooperation’s between two entirely different types of organisms.Dependent describes the friend's relationship, because they depended on each other for everything. Sula and Nel's friendship, was as intense as it was sudden. They found relief in each other's personality, because they find their comfort in each other's environment. When Sula accidentally killed the boy named Chicken Little by throwing him into a river, Nel stuck by Sula. They both took responsibility for the accident, even though Sula was the only participant. At Chicken Little's funeral, Sula and Nel held hands and knew that only the coffin would lie in the earth; the bubbly laughter would stay aboveground with them forever.Their relationship up to this point, is a coexistence of happiness with each other. The Unhealthy Relationship of Su la and Nel  is that they rely on one another for their well being. However, sometimes those organisms become greedy and decide to take in the relationship, instead of sharing with their symbiotic partner. Through this action, it takes on parasitic characteristics. In  Toni Morrison's work,  Sula, Sula Peace and Nel Wright demonstrate how a symbiotic  relationship goes awry. When one partner betrays the other, by taking instead of giving, the other partner suffers.Nel and Sula's relationship suffers because Sula unfortunately takes actions that lead to partaking in a parasitic relationship where she begins to wither away. Nel refuses the parasitic lifestyle and relationship, which causes Sula to wither away. In the midst of her death, Sula finally realizes that she needs the symbiotic relationship with Nel to survive. The interactions between Sula and Nel began symbiotically; however, it develops into a parasitic one with the dependence of Sula on Nel.

Sustainability and Green House Gases

B. You will hold to take a Sustainability/relevant study of a Vietnamese/Multinational company from any one of the undermentioned industries. 1. Electrical and Electronicss 2. Airlines 3. Plastic 4. Agricultural Merchandises REQUIRED: You are required to analyze the chosen study and to compose a study non more than 800 words. Your studies is expected to cover the undermentioned standards 1. Extent of revelation ( Quantitative and Qualitative inside informations ) 2. Format of revelation 3. Carbon coverage criterions adopted by the company 4. Evidence of societal audit in the study, if any Corporate Social Responsibility is a direction issue whereby companies integrate societal and environmental concerns in their concern operations and interactions with their stakeholders. Samsung extremely focuses on uninterrupted betterment and bring forthing enduring returns to stockholders by keeping best pattern in CSR as a seaport for capital and endeavor in the market place, a nurturer of the environment, a developer of communities and a supplier of chances at the workplace. Net Gross saless by Business of Samsung increases 31 % from 2012 around four state such as Americas, Asia, Africa, and China. Samsung Electronics maintains four major types of merchandise including consumer electronic, it and nomadic, semiconducting materials and show panels. Company invested KRW 24.1 trillion for the betterment of production line public presentation in 2013. Furthermore, Samsung invested KRW 536.3 billion to local communities. True and just fiscal coverage, care of sound internal control systems and appropriate hazard direction model, proper precaution of the Group ‘s assets and bar of fraud and other abnormalities are purely committed by the Board. Besides, the company seek their best in convey quality information to investors, regulators, clients, providers, employees and general populace as timely and transparently as possible. There is a web site where employees can give feedback and study fraud or abnormalities from unethical concern of Samsung Electronic s’ employees. The website operates in English, Nipponese, Chinese, and Spanish, and involves 69 locations around the universe with 14 linguistic communications. hypertext transfer protocol: //sec-audit.com is the nexus of website whereby employees can incorporate with company. In workplace country, they perceive that long-run success will be determined by human resource therefore they guarantee a healthy and safe working status, invest in professional growing by supplying preparation and development plans and earnestly see just wage and staff benefits. They prevent hurts and occupational wellness jeopardies by supplying preparation and awareness plan for employees. All employees at all ages, gender, race, faith, nationality and instruction have equal opportunity to boom at common environment. Depending on the place, all staffs can take part in developing plan to better abilities. Loyalty grasp, retirement and public presentation awards are organized to enter employees’ attempt and advance other to seek. In general, Samsung continues to keep their first-class revelation in coverage, in conformity to the Global Reporting Initiative ( GRI-G3 ) model for Sustainability Reporting. They show the uninterrupted betterment in societal and environment concern by supplying extra information where possible. Under CSR study, companies provide a positive image to communities by taking duties in chief countries such as environment market place ( green direction model such as C describing criterion ) , communities and workplace. Samsung Electronics’ GHG emanations reached 2.23 dozenss of CO2 ( Less 0.15 dozenss compare with mark 2.38 dozenss CO2 ) in 2013. However, the decreases in GHG emanations is larger with mark measure is 3.90 million dozenss ( 88.59 million dozenss ) . ( Appendix 1 ) Samsung Electronics receives enfranchisement for about exemplary merchandise ( amount 40 theoretical accounts ) including nomadic phones, proctors, Personal computers, and air conditioners, and parts like LED and semiconducting material memories from participates in KEITI’s C labeling. On the other manus, Samsung received the Low Carbon Product Certification for two air purifier theoretical accounts ( cut down C emanations by up to 32 per centum to heighten energy efficiency ) in February 2014. Samsung Electronics received a Carbon Footprint label for two merchandises ( Galaxy S2 and Galaxy Note 2 ) in 2012 with planetary certification. Up to now, there are seven merchandises has been received a enfranchisement from the Carbon Trust. In the side of merchandises and services quality, they comply with all legal demands and topographic point best quality in their merchandises and services by following ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001. Besides, company besides received the ISO 50001 enfranchisement for energy direction systems at all operation site. To realize the societal part, Samsung set an attempt of quality instruction, occupation chances, and health care were identified as the highest precedences. At the beginning from 2013, company has operated societal part into five cardinal plans ( Samsung operates 383 Smart Schools and wasted KRW 32.8 billion, and wasted KRW 6.5 billion to run 23 Tech Institutes, vocational support plans for young person, puting 11.7 billion for Tomorrow plan and 6.7 billion for the Care Drive plan, 4.4 billion for The Nanum Village plan ) . Corporate societal duty plays a cardinal function in the hereafter development of the company and society. Making CSR, Samsung can convey positive image of the company to society and make stable hard currency flow and work force. On the other manus, it can be a portion of the sensed value in merchandises and services ensuing in higher client satisfaction. degree Celsiuss.Write a brief study on GHG emanations and its relevancy to concern in non more than 250 words. GHG emanations have been hold of import function in making concern. The planetary heating and the lateness in cut downing GHG emanation in the company ( Entire emanations that must be reduced to militate against clime alteration ) kept serious effects to the stable development. Furthermore, GHG can emission straight from the mill and indirectly influence to the procedure of bring forthing authorization. There are seven green house gas ( GHG ) emanations such as Carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) , Methane ( CH4 ) , Azotic oxide ( N2O ) , hydro fluorocarbons ( HFCs ) , per fluorocarbons ( PFCs ) , and hexafluoride ( SF6) and nitrogen tri fluoride ( NF3) . ( Appendix 2 ) All emanations are entered the ambiance or were born from the firing fossil fuels, or by the decay of organic waste in municipal solid waste landfills or during making in agricultural and industrial activities. There are some ways to cut down and command the GHG emanations are represented as followers:Provide C describing criterio n ( the gaining control and storage engineerings ) , ( Appendix 3 )Raise the efficient of authorization,Protect and heighten the reservoir emanations,Promote the agricultural and industrial activities to develop sustainability,Use the merchandise can be recycled, andReduce through methane by recycling every bit good as in bring forthing, bringing, and administering empower.If the GHG emanations have non been controlled by the company, it may be lead to destruct the environment. Hence, company should establish on the criterion for GHG emanations to command and pull off the emanation as possible. Mentions hypertext transfer protocol: //www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/sustainability/sustainabilityreports/ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/sustainability/sustainabilityreports/sustainabilityreports2014.pdf hypertext transfer protocol: //www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/sustainability/sustainabilityreports/download/2014/18_Environmental_Report.pdf hypertext transfer protocol: //www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/ Appendix 1 GHG KPIs and AccomplishmentsKPIDescription200820092010201120122013Korea GHG emanations decreases relative to sales* ( ton CO2 /KRW 100 million )Goal–6.855.654.622.872.38Performance7.445.835.114.462.542.23Reduction ( % , compared to 2008 )–2231404753Global accumulated decreases during product-use stage.Goal––1,1692,6955,1088,469Performance––1,5293,2925,8348,959Appendix 2 The first interview expert can be an academic/researcher on Global warming/environmental scientific discipline. We carried out the first interview with Nguyen Thuy Trang who is pupil at IS-VNU. From the interviewer, we collected some information about the Global heating /environmental scientific discipline. She told that there are seven emanations for green gas: Carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) , Methane ( CH4 ) , Azotic oxide ( N2O ) , hydro fluorocarbons ( HFCs ) , per fluorocarbons ( PFCs ) , and hexafluoride ( SF6) and nitrogen tri fluoride ( NF3) . Furthermore, she assumed that company in heavy industry ( Infrastructure, empower ) , agricultural and forestry through more emanations enter the ambiance. On the other manus, she told us some stages to command and pull off GHG emanations. She commented that if the GHG emanations are non controlled cause by destructing environment. Appendix 3 The 2nd interview conducted with a professional from an audit/accounting house or caputs of Sustainability accounting subdivisions. We carried out the 2nd interview with a individual who is Le Minh Tu, work at State Audit of Vietnam. We had one meeting to interview her some inquiry about the function of GHG study in making concern. She told us the importance of C coverage to any concern and the international Carbon Reporting Standards and some duties in Vietnam to understand extent of C coverage. She convinced that a successful company that carry out the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard by strong and recognized method. Company uses the certification of Carbon Trust Standard to pass on with client. Based on C pes printing to cut down cost and put mark.Furthermore, the C study helped company recognizes the chance to cut down cost and hazard in making concern. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.carbontrust.com/resources/guides/carbon-footprinting-and-reporting/mandatory-carbon-reporting